linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/dma-iommu: Split iommu_dma_map_msi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190429193528.GA14274@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:35:28 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Cc:     Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, jason@...edaemon.net,
        douliyangs@...il.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, tglx@...utronix.de, logang@...tatee.com,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/dma-iommu: Split iommu_dma_map_msi_msg in
 two parts

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 04:57:20PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Thanks for having reworked this. I'm quite happy with the way this looks
> now (modulo the couple of nits Robin and I mentioned, which I'm to
> address myself).
> 
> Jorg: are you OK with this going via the irq tree?

As-is this has a trivial conflict with my
"implement generic dma_map_ops for IOMMUs" series.  But I can tweak
it a bit to avoid that conflict.