linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] soc: add aspeed folder and misc drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAO=notwU7LzEiBmzb6AJrgP3RGXE+66OwZVU8CqVE6RSKRvo1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:35:27 -0700
From:   Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>
To:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, arm-soc <arm@...nel.org>,
        soc@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: add aspeed folder and misc drivers

On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 12:27 PM Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:12 AM Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:08 AM Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 08:28:14AM -0700, Patrick Venture wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 8:22 AM Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 7:26 AM Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Create a SoC folder for the ASPEED parts and place the misc drivers
> > > > > > > currently present into this folder.  These drivers are not generic part
> > > > > > > drivers, but rather only apply to the ASPEED SoCs.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Accidentally lost the Acked-by when re-sending this patchset as I
> > > > > > didn't see it on v1 before re-sending v2 to the larger audience.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since there was a change between v1 and v2, Arnd, I'd appreciate you
> > > > > Ack this version of the patchset since it changes when the soc/aspeed
> > > > > Makefile is followed.
> > > >
> > > > I have no objection for moving stuff out of drivers/misc/ so the SOC
> > > > maintainers are free to take this.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > >
> > > I'm totally confused. This is the second "PATCH v2" of this patch that I came
> > > across, I already applied the first.
> >
> > I think the issue here was that I added to the CC list another email
> > and so you may see the v2  without that mailing list, and a v2 with it
> > --
> >
> > Does this require a v3?  I honestly didn't think so, but this was the
> > first time I had to add more people without needing other changes.
>
> Well, v2 doesn't build. I'll fix it up locally by adding an 'endmenu'
> to drivers/soc/aspeed/Kconfig. But... brings up questions how this was
> tested before submitting?

That's a lost change issue. I'll try to be more diligent in the
future.  My dev workspace  is disconnected from the kernel used for
upstreaming patches, so if i make a change in one it isn't always
reflected in the other.  I'm working on rectifying the underlying
build space issue to let me use the same repo.

>
> scripts/kconfig/conf  --allnoconfig Kconfig
> drivers/soc/Kconfig:24: 'menu' in different file than 'menu'
> drivers/soc/aspeed/Kconfig:1: location of the 'menu'
> drivers/Kconfig:233: 'menu' in different file than 'menu'
> drivers/soc/aspeed/Kconfig:1: location of the 'menu'
> <none>:34: syntax error
>
> > >
> > > Patrick: Follow up with incremental patch in case there's any difference.
> > > Meanwhile, please keep in mind that you're adding a lot of work for people when
> > > you respin patches without following up on the previous version. Thanks!
> >
> > w.r.t this patch series.  I found an issue with v1, and released a v2
> > with the detail of what changed.  I thought that was the correct
> > approach.  I apologize for creating extra work, that's something
> > nobody needs.
>
> It's ok to submit newer versions, but it's convenient when they get
> threaded also in non-gmail mail readers (by using in-reply-to).

Roger that.

>
>
> -Olof