linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-dma: fix residue calculation in stm32-dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:48:56 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Pierre-Yves MORDRET <pierre-yves.mordret@...com>,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: stm32-dma: fix residue calculation in
 stm32-dma

On 30-04-19, 16:58, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:

> >> Hope that will help to clarify.
> > 
> > Yes that helps, maybe we should add these bits in code and changelog..
> > :)I will update the comments and commit message in a V2 in this way
> > 
> > And how does this impact non cyclic case where N descriptors maybe
> > issued. The driver seems to support non cyclic too...
> 
> Correct it supports SG as well, but double buffer mode is not used in
> such case. Hw is programmed under IT for every descriptors : no
> automatic register reloaded as in cyclic mode. We won't end up in the
> situation depicted below.

Okay sounds good then. Can you add a bit more of this in the code (this
was very helpful) not as a fix but documentation so that people (or you
down the line) will remember why this was done like this

Thanks

-- 
~Vinod