[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c79fb09-c310-4426-68f7-8b268100359a@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:09:57 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
gorcunov@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arunks@...eaurora.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
geert+renesas@...der.be, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mguzik@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: get_cmdline use arg_lock instead of mmap_sem
On 30.04.2019 11:18, Michal Koutný wrote:
> The commit a3b609ef9f8b ("proc read mm's {arg,env}_{start,end} with mmap
> semaphore taken.") added synchronization of reading argument/environment
> boundaries under mmap_sem. Later commit 88aa7cc688d4 ("mm: introduce
> arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and env_start|end in mm_struct")
> avoided the coarse use of mmap_sem in similar situations.
>
> get_cmdline can also use arg_lock instead of mmap_sem when it reads the
> boundaries.
>
> Fixes: 88aa7cc688d4 ("mm: introduce arg_lock to protect arg_start|end and env_start|end in mm_struct")
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/util.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 43a2984bccaa..5cf0e84a0823 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -758,12 +758,12 @@ int get_cmdline(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer, int buflen)
> if (!mm->arg_end)
> goto out_mm; /* Shh! No looking before we're done */
>
> - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + spin_lock(&mm->arg_lock);
> arg_start = mm->arg_start;
> arg_end = mm->arg_end;
> env_start = mm->env_start;
> env_end = mm->env_end;
> - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> + spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
>
> len = arg_end - arg_start;
This looks OK for me.
But speaking about existing code it's a secret for me, why we ignore arg_lock
in binfmt code, e.g. in load_elf_binary().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists