[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a48e0a2-a282-159e-a56e-201fbc0faa91@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:11:37 +0300
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arunks@...eaurora.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
geert+renesas@...der.be, ldufour@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mguzik@...hat.com, mhocko@...nel.org, rppt@...ux.ibm.com,
vbabka@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] prctl_set_mm: downgrade mmap_sem to read lock
On 30.04.2019 12:08, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:55:45AM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>> - up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>> + spin_unlock(&mm->arg_lock);
>>> + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>>> return error;
>>
>> Hm, shouldn't spin_lock()/spin_unlock() pair go as a fixup to existing code
>> in a separate patch?
>>
>> Without them, the existing code has a problem at least in get_mm_cmdline().
>
> Seems reasonable to merge it into patch 1.
Sounds sensibly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists