[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12f48b95-7a45-919e-0eb5-30e00e692743@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:34:26 +0300
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mfd: intel-lpss: Add Intel Comet Lake PCI IDs
On 4/16/19 10:55 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 6:10 AM Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 11:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Intel Comet Lake has the same LPSS than Intel Cannon Lake.
>>> Add the new IDs to the list of supported devices.
>
>>> static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
>>> + /* CML */
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02a8), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02a9), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02aa), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02ab), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02c5), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info },
>>> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x02c6), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info },
>>
>> How come it's not cnl_i2c_info?
>
> This is a good question, that's why Jarkko asked Lee to hold on until
> we have confirmation about i2c timings.
>
I got confirmation I2C uses the same input clock than Cannon Lake and
matches with my measurements.
Andy: please do s/bxt_i2c_info/cnl_i2c_info/ in your patch.
--
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists