[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5457d33f-b691-6406-138d-0fc633c1d24c@c-s.fr>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 06:54:07 +0200
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@...vas.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] soc/fsl/qe: qe.c: fold qe_get_num_of_snums into
qe_snums_init
Le 01/05/2019 à 11:29, Rasmus Villemoes a écrit :
> The comment "No QE ever has fewer than 28 SNUMs" is false; e.g. the
> MPC8309 has 14. The code path returning -EINVAL is also a recipe for
> instant disaster, since the caller (qe_snums_init) uncritically
> assigns the return value to the unsigned qe_num_of_snum, and would
> thus proceed to attempt to copy 4GB from snum_init_46[] to the snum[]
> array.
>
> So fold the handling of the legacy fsl,qe-num-snums into
> qe_snums_init, and make sure we do not end up using the snum_init_46
> array in cases other than the two where we know it makes sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
> ---
> drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe.c | 46 ++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe.c
> index 325d689cbf5c..276d7d78ebfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe.c
> @@ -308,24 +308,33 @@ static void qe_snums_init(void)
> int i;
>
> bitmap_zero(snum_state, QE_NUM_OF_SNUM);
> + qe_num_of_snum = 28; /* The default number of snum for threads is 28 */
> qe = qe_get_device_node();
> if (qe) {
> i = of_property_read_variable_u8_array(qe, "fsl,qe-snums",
> snums, 1, QE_NUM_OF_SNUM);
> - of_node_put(qe);
> if (i > 0) {
> + of_node_put(qe);
> qe_num_of_snum = i;
> return;
> }
> + /*
> + * Fall back to legacy binding of using the value of
> + * fsl,qe-num-snums to choose one of the static arrays
> + * above.
> + */
> + of_property_read_u32(qe, "fsl,qe-num-snums", &qe_num_of_snum);
> + of_node_put(qe);
> }
>
> - qe_num_of_snum = qe_get_num_of_snums();
> -
> - if (qe_num_of_snum == 76)
> + if (qe_num_of_snum == 76) {
> snum_init = snum_init_76;
> - else
> + } else if (qe_num_of_snum == 28 || qe_num_of_snum == 46) {
> snum_init = snum_init_46;
> -
> + } else {
> + pr_err("QE: unsupported value of fsl,qe-num-snums: %u\n", qe_num_of_snum);
> + return;
> + }
> memcpy(snums, snum_init, qe_num_of_snum);
> }
>
> @@ -641,30 +650,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(qe_get_num_of_risc);
>
> unsigned int qe_get_num_of_snums(void)
> {
> - struct device_node *qe;
> - int size;
> - unsigned int num_of_snums;
> - const u32 *prop;
> -
> - num_of_snums = 28; /* The default number of snum for threads is 28 */
> - qe = qe_get_device_node();
> - if (!qe)
> - return num_of_snums;
> -
> - prop = of_get_property(qe, "fsl,qe-num-snums", &size);
> - if (prop && size == sizeof(*prop)) {
> - num_of_snums = *prop;
> - if ((num_of_snums < 28) || (num_of_snums > QE_NUM_OF_SNUM)) {
> - /* No QE ever has fewer than 28 SNUMs */
> - pr_err("QE: number of snum is invalid\n");
> - of_node_put(qe);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - of_node_put(qe);
> -
> - return num_of_snums;
> + return qe_num_of_snum;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(qe_get_num_of_snums);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists