lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6defa7bc-ec29-4418-b05c-fb96c03621f6@www.fastmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 02 May 2019 02:49:32 -0400
From:   "Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@...id.au>
To:     "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Vijay Khemka" <vijaykhemka@...com>
Cc:     "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>, "Joel Stanley" <joel@....id.au>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sdasari@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: aspeed-lpc-ctrl: Correct return values



On Thu, 2 May 2019, at 16:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 03:38:36PM -0700, Vijay Khemka wrote:
> > Corrected some of return values with appropriate meanings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vijay Khemka <vijaykhemka@...com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c | 15 +++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c b/drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c
> > index 332210e06e98..97ae341109d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,6 @@ static long aspeed_lpc_ctrl_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> >  		unsigned long param)
> >  {
> >  	struct aspeed_lpc_ctrl *lpc_ctrl = file_aspeed_lpc_ctrl(file);
> > -	struct device *dev = file->private_data;
> >  	void __user *p = (void __user *)param;
> >  	struct aspeed_lpc_ctrl_mapping map;
> >  	u32 addr;
> 
> This change is not reflected in your changelog text :(
> 
> Please fix up, or break this up into multiple patches.

The return value fixes should also be squashed into the patch that introduced those lines
given it hasn't yet been applied.

Further, IIRC I previously suggested removing the dev_err()s entirely, not just switching
them to pr_err(). Returning an error code is enough IMO, there's no need to pollute the
kernel logs with application-level errors. Or make them dev_dbg().

Andrew

> 
> greg k-h
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ