linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] backlight: lm3630a: return 0 on success in update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190502104239.GA24563@basecamp>
Date:   Thu, 2 May 2019 06:42:39 -0400
From:   Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Cc:     lee.jones@...aro.org, jingoohan1@...il.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, pavel@....cz, mark.rutland@....com,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        dmurphy@...com, jonathan@...ek.ca,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel@...felineninja.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] backlight: lm3630a: return 0 on success in
 update_status functions

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 24/04/2019 10:25, Brian Masney wrote:
> > lm3630a_bank_a_update_status() and lm3630a_bank_b_update_status()
> > both return the brightness value if the brightness was successfully
> > updated. Writing to these attributes via sysfs would cause a 'Bad
> > address' error to be returned. These functions should return 0 on
> > success, so let's change it to correct that error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> > Fixes: 28e64a68a2ef ("backlight: lm3630: apply chip revision")
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> 
> Hi Brian, sorry for the delay. For some reason your mails are being dumped
> before they reach me so I only discovered these patches when I paid proper
> attention to the replies and fetched them from patchwork.
> 
> Hi Lee, is the same thing happening for you? ;-)

Huh, that's odd. I haven't ran into that issue when working with people
from Linaro in other subsystems.

As a sanity check, I used 'git send-email' to send this patch to
check-auth@...ifier.port25.com and it verified that I still have SPF,
DKIM, reverse DNS, etc. all setup properly on this domain.

hotmail.com addresses are the only ones I've had issues with in the
past, but I doubt you're forwarding your email there. :)

Brian