lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 May 2019 14:19:19 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
cc:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] HID: rmi: fix devm_add_action_or_reset() parameter

On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Fabien Dessenne wrote:

> The second parameter of devm_add_action_or_reset() shall be a function,
> not a function address.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne <fabien.dessenne@...com>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> index 9e33165..8748d4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-rmi.c
> @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int rmi_setup_irq_domain(struct hid_device *hdev)
>  	if (!hdata->domain)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, &rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);
> +	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&hdev->dev, rmi_irq_teardown, hdata);

Why do you think this is wrong C?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists