lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190503151915.GD2606@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 17:19:15 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com> Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: f68f031d ("Documentation: atomic_t.txt: Explain ordering provided by smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()") On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 07:53:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello, Alan, > > Just following up on the -rcu commit below. I believe that it needs > some adjustment given Peter Zijlstra's addition of "memory" to the x86 > non-value-returning atomics, but thought I should double-check. Right; I should get back to that thread...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists