[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190504070430.57008-1-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 07:04:30 +0000
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
To: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>
CC: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] ocxl: Fix return value check in afu_ioctl()
In case of error, the function eventfd_ctx_fdget() returns ERR_PTR() and
never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should be
replaced with IS_ERR().
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Fixes: 060146614643 ("ocxl: move event_fd handling to frontend")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
index 8aa22893ed76..2870c25da166 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
@@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ static long afu_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
return -EINVAL;
irq_id = ocxl_irq_offset_to_id(ctx, irq_fd.irq_offset);
ev_ctx = eventfd_ctx_fdget(irq_fd.eventfd);
- if (!ev_ctx)
- return -EFAULT;
+ if (IS_ERR(ev_ctx))
+ return PTR_ERR(ev_ctx);
rc = ocxl_irq_set_handler(ctx, irq_id, irq_handler, irq_free, ev_ctx);
break;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists