linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to do sanity with enabled features in image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 5 May 2019 10:51:35 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix to do sanity with enabled features in image

On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
>>>> there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
>>>
>>> We need to figure out per-feature-based rejection, since some of them can
>>> be set without layout change.
>>
>> So any suggestion on how to implement this?
> 
> Which features do we need to disallow? When we introduce new features, they

I guess it should be the new features.

> didn't hurt the previous flow by checking f2fs_sb_has_###().

Yes, but new features may use new disk layout, if old kernel handled it with old
disk layout, there must be problematic.

e.g. format image with -O extra_attr, and mount it with kernel who don't
recognize new inode layout.

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Maybe:
>>
>> if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 14, 0))
>> 	check 4.14+ features
>> else if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 9, 0))
>> 	check 4.9+ features
>> else if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 4, 0))
>> 	check 4.4+ features
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h  | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>  fs/f2fs/super.c |  9 +++++++++
>>>>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>> index f5ffc09705eb..15b640967e12 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>> @@ -151,6 +151,19 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {
>>>>  #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY		0x0400	/* reserved */
>>>>  #define F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM		0x0800
>>>>  
>>>> +#define F2FS_ALL_FEATURES	(F2FS_FEATURE_ENCRYPT |			\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_BLKZONED |			\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_ATOMIC_WRITE |		\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_EXTRA_ATTR |		\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_PRJQUOTA |			\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_INODE_CHKSUM |		\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR |	\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_QUOTA_INO |		\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_INODE_CRTIME |		\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_LOST_FOUND |		\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY |			\
>>>> +				F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)
>>>> +
>>>>  #define __F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, mask)				\
>>>>  	((raw_super->feature & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0)
>>>>  #define F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi, mask)	__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, mask)
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>> index 4f8e9ab48b26..57f2fc6d14ba 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>> @@ -2573,6 +2573,15 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>  		return 1;
>>>>  	}
>>>>  
>>>> +	/* check whether kernel supports all features */
>>>> +	if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->feature) & (~F2FS_ALL_FEATURES)) {
>>>> +		f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
>>>> +			"Unsupported feature:%u: supported:%u",
>>>> +			le32_to_cpu(raw_super->feature),
>>>> +			F2FS_ALL_FEATURES);
>>>> +		return 1;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>>  	/* check CP/SIT/NAT/SSA/MAIN_AREA area boundary */
>>>>  	if (sanity_check_area_boundary(sbi, bh))
>>>>  		return 1;
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.18.0.rc1
> .
>