[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <192bae92-2193-570f-7b50-00334271bd2e@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 09:15:45 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix to do sanity with enabled features
in image
On 2019/5/5 10:51, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2019/5/1 11:22, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 04/29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2019-4-28 21:38, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> This patch fixes to do sanity with enabled features in image, if
>>>>> there are features kernel can not recognize, just fail the mount.
>>>>
>>>> We need to figure out per-feature-based rejection, since some of them can
>>>> be set without layout change.
>>>
>>> So any suggestion on how to implement this?
>>
>> Which features do we need to disallow? When we introduce new features, they
>
> I guess it should be the new features.
>
>> didn't hurt the previous flow by checking f2fs_sb_has_###().
>
> Yes, but new features may use new disk layout, if old kernel handled it with old
> disk layout, there must be problematic.
>
> e.g. format image with -O extra_attr, and mount it with kernel who don't
> recognize new inode layout.
Jaegeuk,
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
>>
>>>
>>> Maybe:
>>>
>>> if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 14, 0))
>>> check 4.14+ features
>>> else if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 9, 0))
>>> check 4.9+ features
>>> else if (LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(4, 4, 0))
>>> check 4.4+ features
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 9 +++++++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> index f5ffc09705eb..15b640967e12 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>>>> @@ -151,6 +151,19 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info {
>>>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY 0x0400 /* reserved */
>>>>> #define F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM 0x0800
>>>>>
>>>>> +#define F2FS_ALL_FEATURES (F2FS_FEATURE_ENCRYPT | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_BLKZONED | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_ATOMIC_WRITE | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_EXTRA_ATTR | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_PRJQUOTA | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_INODE_CHKSUM | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_QUOTA_INO | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_INODE_CRTIME | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_LOST_FOUND | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_VERITY | \
>>>>> + F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM)
>>>>> +
>>>>> #define __F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, mask) \
>>>>> ((raw_super->feature & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0)
>>>>> #define F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi, mask) __F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, mask)
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>> index 4f8e9ab48b26..57f2fc6d14ba 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>> @@ -2573,6 +2573,15 @@ static int sanity_check_raw_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>>> return 1;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + /* check whether kernel supports all features */
>>>>> + if (le32_to_cpu(raw_super->feature) & (~F2FS_ALL_FEATURES)) {
>>>>> + f2fs_msg(sb, KERN_INFO,
>>>>> + "Unsupported feature:%u: supported:%u",
>>>>> + le32_to_cpu(raw_super->feature),
>>>>> + F2FS_ALL_FEATURES);
>>>>> + return 1;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* check CP/SIT/NAT/SSA/MAIN_AREA area boundary */
>>>>> if (sanity_check_area_boundary(sbi, bh))
>>>>> return 1;
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.18.0.rc1
>> .
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists