[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <599086a07da9943e1748d5608357ebc85b2330db.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 10:55:19 +0300
From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: Fam Zheng <fam@...hon.net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Liang Cunming <cunming.liang@...el.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
John Ferlan <jferlan@...hat.com>,
Liu Changpeng <changpeng.liu@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Heitke, Kenneth" <kenneth.heitke@...el.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Amnon Ilan <ailan@...hat.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] nvme/pci: implement the mdev external queue
allocation interface
On Fri, 2019-05-03 at 06:09 -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 12:20:17AM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 15:12 -0600, Heitke, Kenneth wrote:
> > > On 5/2/2019 5:47 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > +static void nvme_ext_queue_free(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, u16 qid)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct nvme_dev *dev = to_nvme_dev(ctrl);
> > > > + struct nvme_queue *nvmeq;
> > > > +
> > > > + mutex_lock(&dev->ext_dev_lock);
> > > > + nvmeq = &dev->queues[qid];
> > > > +
> > > > + if (WARN_ON(!test_bit(NVMEQ_EXTERNAL, &nvmeq->flags)))
> > > > + return;
> > >
> > > This condition is probably not expected to happen (since its a warning)
> > > but do you need to unlock the ext_dev_lock before returning?
> >
> > This is true, I will fix this. This used to be BUG_ON, but due to
> > checkpatch.pl
> > complains I turned them all to WARN_ON, and missed this.
>
> Gentle reminder to trim your replies to the relevant context. It's
> much easier to read when we don't need to scroll through hundreds of
> unnecessary lines.
I fully agree, sorry! Next time I will do this.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
Powered by blists - more mailing lists