linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch: Use static buffer for debugging messages under rq lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 13:50:29 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch: Use static buffer for debugging
 messages under rq lock

On Mon 2019-05-06 19:43:19, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:10:49AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > klp_try_switch_task() is called under klp_mutex. The buffer for
> > debugging messages might be static.
> 
> The patch description is missing a "why" (presumably to reduce stack
> usage).

Exactly. I thought that it was obvious. But I am infected by printk
code where line buffers are 1k and nobody wants them on the stack.

128bytes in klp_try_switch_task() context are acceptable but
it is still rather big buffer.

OK, what about the following commit message?

"klp_try_switch_task() is called under klp_mutex. The buffer for
debugging messages might be static to reduce stack usage."

Best Regards,
Petr