[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47fd3ca6-6910-f101-9b63-f653cd1443f9@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 09:43:15 -0500
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com, jank@...ence.com, joe@...ches.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: intel: filter SoundWire controller device
search
On 5/7/19 7:26 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 03-05-19, 19:29, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> The convention is that the SoundWire controller device is a child of
>> the HDAudio controller. However there can be more than one child
>> exposed in the DSDT table, and the current namespace walk returns the
>> last device.
>>
>> Add a filter and terminate early when a valid _ADR is provided,
>> otherwise keep iterating to find the next child.
>
> So what are the other devices in DSDT here..
this is what I see:
Scope (HDAS)
{
Device (IDA)
{
Name (_ADR, 0x00020001) // _ADR: Address
}
}
I thought this was nonsense but your question triggered me to look into
the Intel SST ACPI specs (not public I am afraid but shared with the OS
who shall not be named).
Using the same source of information as below, I *believe* this is
HDaudio related, bits 31..16 mean HDaudio with codec SDI 2, and NodeId 1
for the function group. This would make sense as I believe there are two
codecs on the board that can be pin-strapped to boot either in HDaudio
or SoundWire mode- but this is a conjecture only.
At any rate, we need a hardware rework and mutual exclusion between
HDaudio and SoundWire, so we have to ignore this one when SoundWire is
enabled.
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * On some Intel platforms, multiple children of the HDAS
>> + * device can be found, but only one of them is the SoundWire
>> + * controller. The SNDW device is always exposed with
>> + * Name(_ADR, 0x40000000) so filter accordingly
>> + */
>> + if (adr != 0x40000000)
>
> I do not recall if 4 corresponds to the links you have or soundwire
> device type, is this number documented somewhere is HDA specs?
I thought it was a magic number, but I did check and for once it's
documented and the values match the spec :-)
I see in the ACPI docs bits 31..28 set to 4 indicate a SoundWire Link
Type and bits 3..0 indicate the SoundWire controller instance, the rest
is reserved to zero.
>
> Also it might good to create a define for this
I will respin this one to add the documentation above, and only filter
on the 4 ms-bits. Thanks for forcing me to RTFM :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists