linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] sched/dl: Improve deadline admission control for asymmetric CPU capacities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190507164349.2823fdaa@nowhere>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 16:43:49 +0200
From:   luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
To:     Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] sched/dl: Improve deadline admission control
 for asymmetric CPU capacities

On Tue, 7 May 2019 15:31:27 +0100
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com> wrote:

> On Tuesday 07 May 2019 at 16:25:23 (+0200), luca abeni wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 May 2019 14:48:52 +0100
> > Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi Luca,
> > > 
> > > On Monday 06 May 2019 at 06:48:31 (+0200), Luca Abeni wrote:  
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > > > b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c index edfcf8d982e4..646d6d349d53
> > > > 100644 --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpu_scale) =
> > > > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE; 
> > > >  void topology_set_cpu_scale(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long
> > > > capacity) {
> > > > +	topology_update_cpu_capacity(cpu, per_cpu(cpu_scale,
> > > > cpu), capacity);    
> > > 
> > > Why is that one needed ? Don't you end up re-building the sched
> > > domains after this anyways ?  
> > 
> > If I remember correctly, this function was called at boot time when
> > the capacities are assigned to the CPU cores.
> > 
> > I do not remember if the sched domain was re-built after this call,
> > but I admit I do not know this part of the kernel very well...  
> 
> Right and things moved recently in this area, see bb1fbdd3c3fd
> ("sched/topology, drivers/base/arch_topology: Rebuild the sched_domain
> hierarchy when capacities change")

Ah, thanks! I missed this change when rebasing the patchset.
I guess this part of the patch has to be updated (and probably became
useless?), then.


			Thanks,
				Luca



> 
> > This achieved the effect of correctly setting up the "rd_capacity"
> > field, but I do not know if there is a better/simpler way to achieve
> > the same result :)  
> 
> OK, that's really an implementation detail, so no need to worry too
> much about it at the RFC stage I suppose :-)
> 
> Thanks,
> Quentin