linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm: socfpga: execute cold reboot by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fd18f55e-2e18-44a3-7e76-e5e59984b729@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 7 May 2019 20:37:11 -0500
From:   Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>
To:     Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com>
Cc:     Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Dalon Westergreen <dalon.westergreen@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: socfpga: execute cold reboot by default



On 5/3/19 4:15 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> This changes system reboot for socfpga to issue a cold reboot by
> default instead of a warm reboot.
> 
> Warm reboot can still be used by setting reboot_mode to
> REBOOT_WARM (e.g. via kernel command line 'reboot='), but this
> patch ensures cold reboot is issued for both REBOOT_COLD and
> REBOOT_HARD.
> 
> Also, cold reboot is more fail safe than warm reboot has some
> issues at least fo CSEL=0 and BSEL=qspi, where the boot rom does
> not set the qspi clock to a valid range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Goldschmidt <simon.k.r.goldschmidt@...il.com>
> ---
> 
> See discussion in this thread on the u-boot ML:
> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2019-April/367463.html
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c
> index 816da0eb6..6abfbf140 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/socfpga.c
> @@ -85,10 +85,10 @@ static void socfpga_cyclone5_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  
>  	temp = readl(rst_manager_base_addr + SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_CTRL);
>  
> -	if (mode == REBOOT_HARD)
> -		temp |= RSTMGR_CTRL_SWCOLDRSTREQ;
> -	else
> +	if (mode == REBOOT_WARM)
>  		temp |= RSTMGR_CTRL_SWWARMRSTREQ;
> +	else
> +		temp |= RSTMGR_CTRL_SWCOLDRSTREQ;
>  	writel(temp, rst_manager_base_addr + SOCFPGA_RSTMGR_CTRL);
>  }
>  
> @@ -98,10 +98,10 @@ static void socfpga_arria10_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  
>  	temp = readl(rst_manager_base_addr + SOCFPGA_A10_RSTMGR_CTRL);
>  
> -	if (mode == REBOOT_HARD)
> -		temp |= RSTMGR_CTRL_SWCOLDRSTREQ;
> -	else
> +	if (mode == REBOOT_WARM)
>  		temp |= RSTMGR_CTRL_SWWARMRSTREQ;
> +	else
> +		temp |= RSTMGR_CTRL_SWCOLDRSTREQ;
>  	writel(temp, rst_manager_base_addr + SOCFPGA_A10_RSTMGR_CTRL);
>  }
>  
> 

Applied, thanks! I think this patch needs to get back-ported into stable
kernel version as well, right?

Dinh