lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 02:20:30 +0000 From: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com> To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> CC: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ls1028a: Add USB dt nodes Hi Rob, On Wednesday, May 08, 2019 00:40, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 3:48 AM Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com> wrote: > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > On Thursday, May 02, 2019 07:54 Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 05:54:26AM +0000, Ran Wang wrote: > > > > This patch adds USB dt nodes for LS1028A. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com> > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > - Rename node from usb3@... to usb@... to meet DTSpec > > > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi | 20 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > > > index 8dd3501..188cfb8 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi > > > > @@ -144,6 +144,26 @@ > > > > clocks = <&sysclk>; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > + usb0:usb@...0000 { > > > ^ space needed > > > > Yes, will update this in next version. > > > > > > + compatible= "snps,dwc3"; > > > > > > Needs an SoC specific compatible. > > > > Do you mean change compatible to "snps,dwc3", "fsl,ls1028a-dwc3" ? > > Well, that's the wrong order, but yes. OK, will update this. > > As I know, so far there is no SoC specific programming for this IP, so > > do you think it's still necessary to add it? > > Yes. All the bugs and quirks are discovered already? Yes, so far I don't receive any SoC specific defect report, I think it's fine. Will work out next version patch, thanks for your time. Regards, Ran
Powered by blists - more mailing lists