lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 8 May 2019 18:38:49 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] v4l: Add source event change for bit-depth

On 5/8/19 5:34 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> On 5/8/19 2:37 PM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> This event indicate that the source bit-depth is changed during
>> run-time. The client must get the new format and re-allocate buffers
>> for it. This can usually happens with video decoder (encoders) when
>> the bit-stream depth is changed from 8 to 10bits or vice versa.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> Change since v1: s/BITDEPTH/BIT_DEPTH
>>
>>  Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst | 7 +++++++
>>  Documentation/media/videodev2.h.rst.exceptions  | 1 +
>>  include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h                  | 1 +
>>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst
>> index dea9c0cc00ab..f7782cbddc5f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.rst
>> @@ -397,6 +397,13 @@ call.
>>  	that many devices are not able to recover from a temporary loss of
>>  	signal and so restarting streaming I/O is required in order for the
>>  	hardware to synchronize to the video signal.
>> +    * - ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_BIT_DEPTH``
> 
> I started to wonder isn't COLOR_DEPTH more appropriate? Bit-depth
> doesn't describe what is actually deep.
> 

I agree. COLOR_DEPTH is a better name.

Regards,

	Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ