[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuJaP2UGiqCRrRX=cwwyqfnmiJ0CG-BXBkTpwKE825xKsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2019 09:44:15 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
jroedel@...e.de, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] soc: tegra: fuse: Change to the correct
__dma_request_channel() prototype
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 23:15, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> 07.05.2019 9:09, Baolin Wang пишет:
> > Since we've introduced one device node parameter for __dma_request_channel(),
> > thus change to the correct function prototype.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
> > index 49ff017..e2571b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
> > @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int tegra20_fuse_probe(struct tegra_fuse *fuse)
> > dma_cap_zero(mask);
> > dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
> >
> > - fuse->apbdma.chan = __dma_request_channel(&mask, dma_filter, NULL);
> > + fuse->apbdma.chan = __dma_request_channel(&mask, dma_filter, NULL, NULL);
> > if (!fuse->apbdma.chan)
> > return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >
> >
>
> 1) Kernel should be kept bisect'able by not having intermediate patches
> that break compilation. Hence you should squash the changes into a
> single patch.
>
> 2) Better to replace __dma_request_channel() with dma_request_channel()
> since they are equal.
Good point. I'll change to use dma_request_channel() in next version
if no other objections. Thanks.
--
Baolin Wang
Best Regards
Powered by blists - more mailing lists