lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190510190124.GE28561@bigcity.dyn.berto.se>
Date:   Fri, 10 May 2019 21:01:24 +0200
From:   Niklas Söderlund 
        <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>
To:     Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     Michael Rodin <mrodin@...adit-jv.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        michael@...in.online,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: i2c: adv748x: initialize bit 7 of
 csi_tx_top_reg_1f

Hi Kieran and Michael,

On 2019-05-10 17:25:24 +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
<snip>

> 
> Niklas, how does RCar-CSI determine the top/bottom sequence?

That patch just got merged in the media tree a few days ago,

    9f7983bdc4925ae2 ("media: rcar-csi2: Propagate the FLD signal for NTSC and PAL")

> 
> Do we have field inversion currently? (or one which is perhaps swapped
> somewhere along the pipeline in rcar-vin?)
> 

I'm not sure which tree this patch is developed on but Steve Longerbeam 
posted a RFC which IMHO had the fields inverted, there was a discussion 
in his thread [1] where I tried to get to the bottom of the issue. My 
conclusions there might be wrong due to the issues addressed in this 
patch.

Michael: Did you have Steve's patch in your tree when testing this?

1. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10904263/

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ