[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190513074120epcms2p54e3a031668274ac1ebace6c5edc0a3f7@epcms2p5>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 16:41:20 +0900
From: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>
To: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@...sung.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Kenneth Heitke <kenneth.heitke@...el.com>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
Minwoo Im <minwoo.im.dev@...il.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] nvme-pci: trigger device coredump on command
timeout
> -static void __maybe_unused nvme_coredump_init(struct nvme_dev *dev);
> -static void __maybe_unused nvme_coredump_logs(struct nvme_dev *dev);
> -static void __maybe_unused nvme_coredump_complete(struct nvme_dev
> *dev);
> +static void nvme_coredump_init(struct nvme_dev *dev);
> +static void nvme_coredump_logs(struct nvme_dev *dev);
> +static void nvme_coredump_complete(struct nvme_dev *dev);
You just have added those three prototypes in previous patch. Did I miss
something here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists