[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190513105027.GQ9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:50:27 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Sri Krishna chowdary <schowdary@...dia.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] genirq/timings: Add selftest for circular array
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:29:51PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Due to the complexity of the code and the difficulty to debug it,
> let's add some selftests to the framework in order to spot issues or
> regression at boot time when the runtime testing is enabled for this
> subsystem.
>
> This tests the circular buffer at the limits and validates:
> - the encoding / decoding of the values
> - the macro to browse the irq timings circular buffer
> - the function to push data in the circular buffer
> kernel/irq/timings.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Is it possible to have it in a separate C-file?
> +config TEST_IRQ_TIMINGS
> + bool "IRQ timings selftest"
> + default n
This is already default.
> + depends on IRQ_TIMINGS
> + help
> + Enable this option to test the irq timings code on boot.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists