lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 May 2019 14:48:30 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [1/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Adjust a message construction

> I realize that you don't like it, although I have no idea why.
> Does it make the code slower?

Would you like to compare the run time characteristics from creating and
looking up an identifier for a Python variable to direct passing of
a concatenated string for the desired function call?


> I think that staying within 80 characters would be a much greater
> benefit that all of these baseless concerns.

Are you aware of another code formatting option?
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#string-literal-concatenation

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists