[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYuC8dgKs04HmyCaKeQ_xwqKBxnh=zsOFjQK+3Fq7AZRyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 19:02:26 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com, ezequiel@...labora.com,
treding@...dia.com, niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Subject: test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL on stable 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
Do you see test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL on stable 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
kernel branches ?
test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: OK
fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.16.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1132):
reserved not zeroed
test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL
Test passes on mainline, -next, 5.0 and 4.19
Test failed on 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
steps to reproduce:
# boot any 4.9/4.14 kernel on x86_64 / Juno / hikey device
# install v4l-utils package
# modprobe vivid.ko no_error_inj=1
# v4l2-compliance -v -d /dev/video0
Full test log,
https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/708755#L1791
Test results comparison on all branches,
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/_/comparetest/?project=22&project=6&project=58&project=135&project=40&project=23&project=159&suite=v4l2-compliance&test=VIDIOC_G-S_PARM
Best Regards
Naresh Kamboju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists