[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5de0df37-f0d0-f54c-2eef-a7533cbe7a25@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:38:28 +0200
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com, ezequiel@...labora.com,
treding@...dia.com, niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL on stable 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
On 5/13/19 3:32 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Do you see test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL on stable 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
> kernel branches ?
Probably related to commit 8a7c5594c0202 (media: v4l2-ioctl: clear fields in s_parm).
Regards,
Hans
>
> test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: OK
> fail: ../../../v4l-utils-1.16.0/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1132):
> reserved not zeroed
> test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL
>
> Test passes on mainline, -next, 5.0 and 4.19
> Test failed on 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4
>
> steps to reproduce:
> # boot any 4.9/4.14 kernel on x86_64 / Juno / hikey device
> # install v4l-utils package
> # modprobe vivid.ko no_error_inj=1
> # v4l2-compliance -v -d /dev/video0
>
> Full test log,
> https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/708755#L1791
>
> Test results comparison on all branches,
> https://qa-reports.linaro.org/_/comparetest/?project=22&project=6&project=58&project=135&project=40&project=23&project=159&suite=v4l2-compliance&test=VIDIOC_G-S_PARM
>
> Best Regards
> Naresh Kamboju
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists