[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUzAjUFGd=xZRmCbyLfvDgC_WbPYyXB=OznwTkcV-PKNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 08:51:04 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
jan.setjeeilers@...cle.com, Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC KVM 06/27] KVM: x86: Exit KVM isolation on IRQ entry
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 7:39 AM Alexandre Chartre
<alexandre.chartre@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> From: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
>
> Next commits will change most of KVM #VMExit handlers to run
> in KVM isolated address space. Any interrupt handler raised
> during execution in KVM address space needs to switch back
> to host address space.
>
> This patch makes sure that IRQ handlers will run in full
> host address space instead of KVM isolated address space.
IMO this needs to be somewhere a lot more central. What about NMI and
MCE? Or async page faults? Or any other entry?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists