[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190514090326.2f4288ae.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 09:03:26 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: Erik Skultety <eskultet@...hat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"arei.gonglei@...wei.com" <arei.gonglei@...wei.com>,
"aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"Zhengxiao.zx@...baba-inc.com" <Zhengxiao.zx@...baba-inc.com>,
"shuangtai.tst@...baba-inc.com" <shuangtai.tst@...baba-inc.com>,
"qemu-devel@...gnu.org" <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
"eauger@...hat.com" <eauger@...hat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Yang, Ziye" <ziye.yang@...el.com>,
"mlevitsk@...hat.com" <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
"pasic@...ux.ibm.com" <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
"felipe@...anix.com" <felipe@...anix.com>,
"Liu, Changpeng" <changpeng.liu@...el.com>,
"Ken.Xue@....com" <Ken.Xue@....com>,
"jonathan.davies@...anix.com" <jonathan.davies@...anix.com>,
"He, Shaopeng" <shaopeng.he@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"libvir-list@...hat.com" <libvir-list@...hat.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com" <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
"Wang, Zhi A" <zhi.a.wang@...el.com>,
"cjia@...dia.com" <cjia@...dia.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"berrange@...hat.com" <berrange@...hat.com>,
"dinechin@...hat.com" <dinechin@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] vfio/mdev: add version attribute for mdev device
On Tue, 14 May 2019 02:12:35 -0400
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:28:04PM +0800, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > In case of libvirt checking the compatibility, it won't matter how good the
> > error message in the kernel log is and regardless of how many error states you
> > want to handle, libvirt's only limited to errno here, since we're going to do
> > plain read/write, so our internal error message returned to the user is only
> > going to contain what the errno says - okay, of course we can (and we DO)
> > provide libvirt specific string, further specifying the error but like I
> > mentioned, depending on how many error cases we want to distinguish this may be
> > hard for anyone to figure out solely on the error code, as apps will most
> > probably not parse the
> > logs.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Erik
> hi Erik
> do you mean you are agreeing on defining common errors and only returning errno?
>
> e.g.
> #define ENOMIGRATION 140 /* device not supporting migration */
> #define EUNATCH 49 /* software version not match */
> #define EHWNM 142 /* hardware not matching*/
Defining custom error codes is probably not such a good idea... can we
match to common error codes instead? Do we have a good idea about
common error categories, anyway?
(Btw: does libvirt do a generic error-to-description translation, or
does it match to the context? I.e., can libvirt translate well-defined
error codes to a useful message for a specific case?)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists