linux-kernel - Re: [RFC KVM 06/27] KVM: x86: Exit KVM isolation on IRQ entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190514070719.GD2589@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 09:07:19 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        jan.setjeeilers@...cle.com, Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
        Jonathan Adams <jwadams@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC KVM 06/27] KVM: x86: Exit KVM isolation on IRQ entry

On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 11:13:34AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:28 AM Alexandre Chartre
> <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com> wrote:

> > Actually, I am not sure this is effectively useful because the IRQ
> > handler is probably faulting before it tries to exit isolation, so
> > the isolation exit will be done by the kvm page fault handler. I need
> > to check that.
> >
> 
> The whole idea of having #PF exit with a different CR3 than was loaded
> on entry seems questionable to me.  I'd be a lot more comfortable with
> the whole idea if a page fault due to accessing the wrong data was an
> OOPS and the code instead just did the right thing directly.

So I've ran into this idea before; it basically allows a lazy approach
to things.

I'm somewhat conflicted on things, on the one hand, changing CR3 from
#PF is a natural extention in that #PF already changes page-tables (for
userspace / vmalloc etc..), on the other hand, there's a thin line
between being lazy and being sloppy.

If we're going down this route; I think we need a very coherent design
and strong rules.