lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 09:08:31 +0200
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
        Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: uartlite: avoid null pointer dereference
 during rmmod

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:32:19AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> After commit 415b43bdb008 "tty: serial: uartlite: Move uart register to
> probe", calling uart_unregister_driver unconditionally will trigger a
> null pointer dereference due to ulite_uart_driver may not registed.
> 
>   CPU: 1 PID: 3755 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.1.0+ #28
>   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
>   Call Trace:
>    __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
>    dump_stack+0xa9/0x10e lib/dump_stack.c:113
>    __kasan_report+0x171/0x18d mm/kasan/report.c:321
>    kasan_report+0xe/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:614
>    tty_unregister_driver+0x19/0x100 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:3383
>    uart_unregister_driver+0x30/0xc0 drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c:2579
>    __do_sys_delete_module kernel/module.c:1027 [inline]
>    __se_sys_delete_module kernel/module.c:970 [inline]
>    __x64_sys_delete_module+0x244/0x330 kernel/module.c:970
>    do_syscall_64+0x72/0x2a0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:298
>    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> Call uart_unregister_driver only if ulite_uart_driver.state not null to
> fix it.
> 
> Cc: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
> Cc: Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Fixes: 415b43bdb008 ("tty: serial: uartlite: Move uart register to probe")
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> index b8b912b5a8b9..06e79c11141d 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/uartlite.c
> @@ -897,7 +897,8 @@ static int __init ulite_init(void)
>  static void __exit ulite_exit(void)
>  {
>  	platform_driver_unregister(&ulite_platform_driver);
> -	uart_unregister_driver(&ulite_uart_driver);
> +	if (ulite_uart_driver.state)
> +		uart_unregister_driver(&ulite_uart_driver);
>  }
>  
>  module_init(ulite_init);

This looks like you're just papering over the real issue, which is the
crazy idea of ultimately registering one driver per port:

	https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1539685088-13465-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti.datta@gmail.com

It appears only the preparatory patches from that series were applied,
and I think whoever is responsible should consider reverting those
instead.

If the statically allocated port state is that big of any issue, you
need to make serial core support dynamic allocation.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ