[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1683867.ro8ObbCUgW@kreacher>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 23:29:18 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
jank@...ence.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / device_sysfs: change _ADR representation to 64 bits
On Monday, May 6, 2019 10:36:22 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 6:58 AM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 01-05-19, 07:53, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > Standards such as the MIPI DisCo for SoundWire 1.0 specification
> > > assume the _ADR field is 64 bits.
> > >
> > > _ADR is defined as an "Integer" represented as 64 bits since ACPI 2.0
> > > released in 2002. The low levels already use _ADR as 64 bits, e.g. in
> > > struct acpi_device_info.
> > >
> > > This patch bumps the representation used for sysfs to 64 bits. To
> > > avoid any compatibility/ABI issues, the printf format is only extended
> > > to 16 characters when the actual _ADR value exceeds the 32 bit
> > > maximum.
> > >
> > > Example with a SoundWire device, the results show the complete
> > > vendorID and linkID which were omitted before:
> > >
> > > Before:
> > > $ more /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device\:38/adr
> > > 0x5d070000
> > > After:
> > > $ more /sys/bus/acpi/devices/device\:38/adr
> > > 0x000010025d070000
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: only use 64 bits when required to avoid compatibility issues
> > > (feedback from Vinod and Rafael)
> > >
> > > drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 6 ++++--
> > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +-
> > > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> > > index 8940054d6250..7dda0ee05cd1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
> > > @@ -428,8 +428,10 @@ static ssize_t acpi_device_adr_show(struct device *dev,
> > > {
> > > struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
> > >
> > > - return sprintf(buf, "0x%08x\n",
> > > - (unsigned int)(acpi_dev->pnp.bus_address));
> > > + if (acpi_dev->pnp.bus_address > 0xFFFFFFFF)
> >
> > Would prefer to use U32_MAX instead of 0xFFFFFFFF
>
> I would.
>
I have made that change manually and applied the patch.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists