linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ACPI / device_sysfs: change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 16:37:13 -0500
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        "moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..." 
        <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        jank@...ence.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>,
        "open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2] ACPI / device_sysfs: change _ADR
 representation to 64 bits


>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
>>>> index 8940054d6250..7dda0ee05cd1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
>>>> @@ -428,8 +428,10 @@ static ssize_t acpi_device_adr_show(struct device *dev,
>>>>   {
>>>>        struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
>>>>
>>>> -     return sprintf(buf, "0x%08x\n",
>>>> -                    (unsigned int)(acpi_dev->pnp.bus_address));
>>>> +     if (acpi_dev->pnp.bus_address > 0xFFFFFFFF)
>>>
>>> Would prefer to use U32_MAX instead of 0xFFFFFFFF
>>
>> I would.
>>
> 
> I have made that change manually and applied the patch.
> 
> Thanks!

Thanks, much appreciated.