linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 3/6] libnvdimm: add dax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <676644679.28490825.1557811637861.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 May 2019 01:27:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@...hat.com>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, david <david@...morbit.com>,
        Qemu Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, jstaron@...gle.com,
        linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        Vishal L Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        jmoyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        yuval shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, lcapitulino@...hat.com,
        Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>,
        Nitesh Narayan Lal <nilal@...hat.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>,
        cohuck@...hat.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 3/6] libnvdimm: add dax_dev sync flag


> >
> >
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > While testing device mapper with DAX, I faced a bug with the commit:
> >
> > commit ad428cdb525a97d15c0349fdc80f3d58befb50df
> > Author: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> > Date:   Wed Feb 20 21:12:50 2019 -0800
> >
> > When I reverted the condition to old code[1] it worked for me. I
> > am thinking when we map two different devices (e.g with device mapper),
> > will
> > start & end pfn still point to same pgmap? Or there is something else which
> > I am missing here.
> >
> > Note: I tested only EXT4.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > -               if (pgmap && pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)
> > +               end_pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn_t_to_pfn(end_pfn), NULL);
> > +               if (pgmap && pgmap == end_pgmap && pgmap->type ==
> > MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX
> > +                               && pfn_t_to_page(pfn)->pgmap == pgmap
> > +                               && pfn_t_to_page(end_pfn)->pgmap == pgmap
> > +                               && pfn_t_to_pfn(pfn) ==
> > PHYS_PFN(__pa(kaddr))
> > +                               && pfn_t_to_pfn(end_pfn) ==
> > PHYS_PFN(__pa(end_kaddr)))
> 
> Ugh, yes, device-mapper continues to be an awkward fit for dax (or
> vice versa). We would either need a way to have a multi-level pfn to
> pagemap lookup for composite devices, or a way to discern that even
> though the pagemap is different that the result is still valid / not
> an indication that we have leaked into an unassociated address range.
> Perhaps a per-daxdev callback for ->dax_supported() so that
> device-mapper internals can be used for this validation.

Yes, Will look at it.

> 
> We need to get that fixed up, but I don't see it as a blocker /
> pre-requisite for virtio-pmem.

Agree. Will send virtio-pmem patch series.

Thank you,
Pankaj
> 
>