lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190515133230.GB5316@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 15:32:30 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     parna.naveenkumar@...il.com
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bsr: do not use assignment in if condition

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 06:45:24PM +0530, parna.naveenkumar@...il.com wrote:
> From: Naveen Kumar Parna <parna.naveenkumar@...il.com>
> 
> checkpatch.pl does not like assignment in if condition
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kumar Parna <parna.naveenkumar@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/bsr.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/bsr.c b/drivers/char/bsr.c
> index a6cef548e01e..2b00748b83d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/bsr.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/bsr.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,8 @@ static int __init bsr_init(void)
>  		goto out_err_2;
>  	}
>  
> -	if ((ret = bsr_create_devs(np)) < 0) {
> +	ret = bsr_create_devs(np);
> +	if (ret  < 0) {

Checkpatch also probably does not like that if statement :(

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ