[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fc8ad575-9ad6-27ab-3255-ef0f41f5b1c5@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:32:30 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
syadagir@...eaurora.org, mjavid@...eaurora.org,
evgreen@...omium.org, Ben Chan <benchan@...gle.com>,
Eric Caruso <ejcaruso@...gle.com>, abhishek.esse@...il.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] soc: qcom: ipa: the generic software interface
On 5/15/19 5:47 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 3:25 AM Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> The per-event interrupt handling seems to be more complex than
> necessary:
I just noticed this message. I'll take another look at this
whole interrupt control mechanism and will try to streamline
it along the lines of what you describe.
Thanks.
-Alex
>
>> +/* Enable or disable an event interrupt */
>> +static void
>> +_gsi_irq_control_event(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + u32 mask = BIT(evt_ring_id);
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + if (enable)
>> + gsi->event_enable_bitmap |= mask;
>> + else
>> + gsi->event_enable_bitmap &= ~mask;
>> +
>> + val = gsi->event_enable_bitmap;
>> + iowrite32(val, gsi->virt + GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_MSK_OFFSET);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void gsi_irq_enable_event(struct gsi *gsi, u32 evt_ring_id)
>> +{
>> + _gsi_irq_control_event(gsi, evt_ring_id, true);
>
> You maintain a bitmap here of the enabled-state, and have
> to use a spinlock to ensure that the two are in sync.
>
>> +/* Returns true if the interrupt state (enabled or not) changed */
>> +static bool gsi_channel_intr(struct gsi_channel *channel, bool enable)
>> +{
>> + u32 evt_ring_id = channel->evt_ring_id;
>> + struct gsi *gsi = channel->gsi;
>> + u32 mask = BIT(evt_ring_id);
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + bool different;
>> + u32 enabled;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&gsi->spinlock, flags);
>> +
>> + enabled = gsi->event_enable_bitmap & mask;
>> + different = enable == !enabled;
>> +
>> + if (different) {
>> + if (enabled)
>> + gsi_irq_disable_event(channel->gsi, evt_ring_id);
>> + else
>> + gsi_irq_enable_event(channel->gsi, evt_ring_id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsi->spinlock, flags);
>> +
>> + return different;
>> +}
>
> This gets called for each active channel, so you repeatedly
> have to get the spinlock and read the irq-enabled state for it.
>
>> +static void gsi_isr_ieob(struct gsi *gsi)
>> +{
>> + u32 evt_mask;
>> +
>> + evt_mask = ioread32(gsi->virt + GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_OFFSET);
>> + evt_mask &= ioread32(gsi->virt + GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_MSK_OFFSET);
>> + iowrite32(evt_mask, gsi->virt + GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_CLR_OFFSET);
>> +
>> + while (evt_mask) {
>> + u32 evt_ring_id = __ffs(evt_mask);
>> +
>> + evt_mask ^= BIT(evt_ring_id);
>> +
>> + gsi_event_handle(gsi, evt_ring_id);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> However, you start out by clearing all bits here.
>
> Why not skip the clearing and and leave the interrupts enabled,
> while moving the GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_CLR_OFFSET
> write (for a single channel that was completed) to the end of
> gsi_channel_poll()?
>
> Something like
>
> static void gsi_isr_ieob(struct gsi *gsi)
> {
> u32 evt_mask;
>
> evt_mask = ioread32(gsi->virt + GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_OFFSET);
> while (evt_mask) {
> u32 evt_ring_id = __ffs(evt_mask);
> evt_mask ^= BIT(evt_ring_id);
>
> napi_schedule(gsi->evt_ring[evt_ring_id].channel.napi);
> }
> }
>
> I also removed the GSI_CNTXT_SRC_IEOB_IRQ_MSK_OFFSET
> read here, as that is probably more expensive than calling napi_schedule()
> for a channel that is already scheduled. Most of the time, I'd expect the
> interrupt to only signal a single channel anyway.
>
> Arnd
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists