linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/115] 4.14.120-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190515164215.GA6053@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 May 2019 18:42:15 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/115] 4.14.120-stable review

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:26:38AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:54:40PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.120 release.
> > There are 115 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri 17 May 2019 09:04:39 AM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> There is a build error with s390 builds.
> 
> arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c: In function 'nospec_auto_detect':
> arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c:84:19: error:
> 	invalid storage class for function 'spectre_v2_setup_early'
> 
> arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c:96:27: error:
> 	initializer element is not constant
> 
> and more. The file has merge damage in function nospec_auto_detect().
> Culprit is commit 91788fcb21d0 ("s390/speculation: Support 'mitigations='
> cmdline option"). That patch is in v4.14.119, so you'll have to patch
> it up manually. Example patch (compile tested) below.
> 
> Guenter
> 
> ---
> >From c4430ee29bf57cb1327d52b38acf3f616be9d7f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 09:22:31 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] s390/speculation: Fix build error caused by bad backport
> 
> The backport of commit 0336e04a6520 ("s390/speculation: Support
> 'mitigations=' cmdline option") introduces a build error. Fix it up.
> 
> Fixes: 91788fcb21d0 ("s390/speculation: Support 'mitigations=' cmdline option")
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
> index 83e597688562..6956902bba12 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/nospec-branch.c
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ void __init nospec_auto_detect(void)
>  		if (IS_ENABLED(CC_USING_EXPOLINE))
>  			nospec_disable = 1;
>  		__clear_facility(82, S390_lowcore.alt_stfle_fac_list);
> +	}
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CC_USING_EXPOLINE)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * The kernel has been compiled with expolines.
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Yes, that backport was broken, good catch.  Now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h