[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190515071601.GQ4319@dell>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:16:01 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: masonccyang@...c.com.tw
Cc: bbrezillon@...nel.org, broonie@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>, juliensu@...c.com.tw,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, marek.vasut@...il.com,
mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, zhengxunli@...c.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] spi: Add Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF SPI
controller driver
On Wed, 15 May 2019, masonccyang@...c.com.tw wrote:
> Hi Jones,
>
>
> > > +
> > > +struct rpc_spi {
> > > + struct rpc_mfd *mfd;
> >
> > The term MFD isn't a real thing. What you're obtaining below is
> > driver data and is normally articulated as 'ddata' in drivers.
>
> yes, it's just imply that data is from MFD.
>
> Should I rename "mfd" ?
Yes please.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists