linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] uapi, x86: Fix the syscall numbering of the mount API syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3qtr4kvVRf0bvUOzv342px++wi7iA44zCmNRi_ipUd_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 May 2019 13:29:19 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] uapi, x86: Fix the syscall numbering of the mount API syscalls

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:24 PM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Fix the syscall numbering of the mount API syscalls so that the numbers
> match between i386 and x86_64 and that they're in the common numbering
> scheme space.
>
> Fixes: a07b20004793 ("vfs: syscall: Add open_tree(2) to reference or clone a mount")
> Fixes: 2db154b3ea8e ("vfs: syscall: Add move_mount(2) to move mounts around")
> Fixes: 24dcb3d90a1f ("vfs: syscall: Add fsopen() to prepare for superblock creation")
> Fixes: ecdab150fddb ("vfs: syscall: Add fsconfig() for configuring and managing a context")
> Fixes: 93766fbd2696 ("vfs: syscall: Add fsmount() to create a mount for a superblock")
> Fixes: cf3cba4a429b ("vfs: syscall: Add fspick() to select a superblock for reconfiguration")
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>