linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/18] soc: qcom: create "include/soc/qcom/rmnet.h"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eca367f2-e019-f785-509d-5662ed7b7398@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 May 2019 12:27:13 -0500
From:   Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
To:     Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        stranche@...eaurora.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, syadagir@...eaurora.org,
        mjavid@...eaurora.org, evgreen@...omium.org, benchan@...gle.com,
        ejcaruso@...gle.com, abhishek.esse@...il.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/18] soc: qcom: create "include/soc/qcom/rmnet.h"

On 5/15/19 8:09 PM, Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan wrote:
. . .
> Hi Alex
> 
> Could we instead have the rmnet header definition in
> include/linux/if_rmnet.h

I have no objection to that, but I don't actually know what
the criteria are for putting a file in that directory.

Glancing at other "if_*" files there it seems sensible, but
because I don't know, I'd like to have a little better
justification.

Can you provide a good explanation about why these
definitions belong in "include/linux/if_rmnet.h" instead
of "include/soc/qcom/rmnet.h"?

Thanks.

					-Alex