linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] staging: fieldbus: core: fix ->poll() annotation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190521143730.GJ31203@kadam>
Date:   Tue, 21 May 2019 17:37:30 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     Oscar Gomez Fuente <oscargomezf@...il.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: fieldbus: core: fix ->poll() annotation

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:20:09AM -0400, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> From: Oscar Gomez Fuente <oscargomezf@...il.com>
> 
> ->poll() functions should return __poll_t, but the fieldbus
> core's poll() does not. This generates a sparse warning.
> 
> Fix the ->poll() return value, and use recommended __poll_t
> constants (EPOLLxxx).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Gomez Fuente <oscargomezf@...il.com>
> ---

If you're resending someone's patch, you have to add your own Signed off
by line as well.  Everyone who touches a patch has to sign that they
didn't add any of SCO's all powerful UnixWare source code into the
patch.

regards,
dan carpenter