lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190522111354.GA5849@zhanggen-UX430UQ>
Date:   Wed, 22 May 2019 19:13:54 +0800
From:   Gen Zhang <blackgod016574@...il.com>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty_io: Fix a missing-check bug in drivers/tty/tty_io.c

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Where do you see that the kernel is dereferencing tty->dev without
> checking for NULL first? If you can find that, then that would indeed be
> a bug that needs fixing.
Thanks for your reply, Johan!
I examined the code but failed to find this situation.
Anyway, checking return value of tty_get_device() is theoritically
right. But tty->dev is never dereferenced, so checking is not needed.
However, what if in later kernels tty->dev is dereferenced by some
codes? Is it better to apply this check for this reason?
Thanks
Gen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ