lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 May 2019 11:10:39 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:54 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:51:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> >
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   8122de54602e ("dt-bindings: Convert vendor prefixes to json-schema")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commits:
> >
> >   b4a2c0055a4f ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for VXT Ltd")
> >   b1b0d36bdb15 ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: simple: Add binding for TFC S9700RTWV43TR-01B")
> >   fbd8b69ab616 ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for Evervision Electronics")
> >
> > from the drm-misc tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I deleted the file and added the patch below) and can
> > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> I just took your patch and pushed a temp branch there:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mripard/linux.git/commit/?h=drm-misc-next&id=3832f2cad5307ebcedeead13fbd8d3cf06ba5e90
>
> Rob, Stephen, are you ok with the change? If so, I'll push it.

The 'tfc' line is missing a ':' on the end. Does the file pass
dt_binding_check like that?

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ