linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 09:12:53 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with Linus' tree

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:10:39AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 6:54 AM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:51:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > >   8122de54602e ("dt-bindings: Convert vendor prefixes to json-schema")
> > >
> > > from Linus' tree and commits:
> > >
> > >   b4a2c0055a4f ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for VXT Ltd")
> > >   b1b0d36bdb15 ("dt-bindings: drm/panel: simple: Add binding for TFC S9700RTWV43TR-01B")
> > >   fbd8b69ab616 ("dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for Evervision Electronics")
> > >
> > > from the drm-misc tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I deleted the file and added the patch below) and can
> > > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
> > > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> > > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> > > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> > > tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> >
> > I just took your patch and pushed a temp branch there:
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mripard/linux.git/commit/?h=drm-misc-next&id=3832f2cad5307ebcedeead13fbd8d3cf06ba5e90
> >
> > Rob, Stephen, are you ok with the change? If so, I'll push it.
>
> The 'tfc' line is missing a ':' on the end.

That's on me, sorry.

> Does the file pass dt_binding_check like that?

No, it didn't but I overlooked it somehow. I've pushed that patch with
the extra semi-column.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)