lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <babab0b4-7d12-15f1-e4ae-70a2ed832d78@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 May 2019 22:40:44 -0400
From:   Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
To:     Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Heesoon Kim <Heesoon.Kim@...atus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bonding/802.3ad: fix slave link initialization
 transition states

On 5/24/19 5:16 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Once in a while, with just the right timing, 802.3ad slaves will fail to
>> properly initialize, winding up in a weird state, with a partner system
>> mac address of 00:00:00:00:00:00. This started happening after a fix to
>> properly track link_failure_count tracking, where an 802.3ad slave that
>> reported itself as link up in the miimon code, but wasn't able to get a
>> valid speed/duplex, started getting set to BOND_LINK_FAIL instead of
>> BOND_LINK_DOWN. That was the proper thing to do for the general "my link
>> went down" case, but has created a link initialization race that can put
>> the interface in this odd state.
> 
> 	Reading back in the git history, the ultimate cause of this
> "weird state" appears to be devices that assert NETDEV_UP prior to
> actually being able to supply sane speed/duplex values, correct?
> 
> 	Presuming that this is the case, I don't see that there's much
> else to be done here, and so:
> 
> Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>

Correct, we've got an miimon "device is up", but still can't get speed 
and/or duplex in this case.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod@...hat.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ