[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2586134.4dTKnEaoxt@kreacher>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 12:34:02 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: power: Use of_clk_get_parent_count()
On Saturday, May 25, 2019 2:01:55 PM CEST Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Use of_clk_get_parent_count() instead of open coding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> index 59d19dd64928..9c7e83267eac 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> @@ -195,8 +195,7 @@ int of_pm_clk_add_clks(struct device *dev)
> if (!dev || !dev->of_node)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - count = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "clocks",
> - "#clock-cells");
> + count = of_clk_get_parent_count(dev->of_node);
> if (count <= 0)
> return -ENODEV;
>
>
I need someone to look at this from DT perspective.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists