[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX=o+gT6fbpZcj8jQbHi9LJci9CX72DG5j+DKYxuSkYvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 13:08:05 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: base: power: Use of_clk_get_parent_count()
Hi Kefeng,
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 1:54 PM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com> wrote:
> Use of_clk_get_parent_count() instead of open coding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> @@ -195,8 +195,7 @@ int of_pm_clk_add_clks(struct device *dev)
> if (!dev || !dev->of_node)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - count = of_count_phandle_with_args(dev->of_node, "clocks",
> - "#clock-cells");
> + count = of_clk_get_parent_count(dev->of_node);
> if (count <= 0)
> return -ENODEV;
Given of_clk_get_parent_count() is provided by <linux/of_clk.h>, I think
you should add an include for that.
With the above fixed:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists