linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190528055831.GA11279@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 07:58:31 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, laurentiu.tudor@....com,
        stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        marex@...x.de, leoyang.li@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        robin.murphy@....com, noring@...rew.org, JuergenUrban@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] prerequisites for device reserved local mem
 rework

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:07:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> I have no objection for you just taking this whole series as-is, no need
> to worry about merge conflicts with the USB tree, I doubt anything will
> be touching this area of code anytime soon.
> 
> So if you want to take it now, feel free to add:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

Given that I'll pull it in, shouldn't this be a Reviewed-by or Acked-by?