linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 May 2019 08:47:59 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     laurentiu.tudor@....com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, marex@...x.de, leoyang.li@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
        noring@...rew.org, JuergenUrban@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] prerequisites for device reserved local mem rework

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 07:58:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 09:07:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > I have no objection for you just taking this whole series as-is, no need
> > to worry about merge conflicts with the USB tree, I doubt anything will
> > be touching this area of code anytime soon.
> > 
> > So if you want to take it now, feel free to add:
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> 
> Given that I'll pull it in, shouldn't this be a Reviewed-by or Acked-by?

Good point, I don't usually do this, so I forgot:
	Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>